EE Times article that summarizes my response
The topics I cover are:
1. Requiring a safety argument that deals with the challenges of validating machine learning
2. Requiring transparent independence in safety assessment
3. Triggering safety reassessment based on safety integrity, rather than “significant” functionality
4. Requiring assessment of changes that can compromise the triggering of fall-back strategies
5. Characterizing what “reasonable” might mean regarding anticipation of exceptional scenarios
6. Assuring the integrity of data that is likely to be used for crash investigations
7. Diagnostics that encompass non-collision failures of components and end-of-life reliability loss
8. More uniform codification of traffic rule exceptions
9. Ensuring the safety of driver-takeover strategies for SAE Level 2 systems
Document pointers:
- My draft response
- My Op-Ed article with a high level overview of the first three issues
- The DoT draft policy
Comments either to this blog or to my university e-mail are welcome.
koopman - at - cmu.edu
I might not have time to respond in detail to all comments, but I appreciate anything that will help improve this response.
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét